EIN: 65-1116984 · MARCO ISLAND, FL · Data spans: TY2020–TY2024
Most recent filing: Tax Year 2024.
A more recent filing may not yet be published.
Sailing's public record, made legible. All numbers come directly from this organization's own sworn 990 filing. Patterns are computed from years of filings — not assessments or judgments.
Read trends in context: compare like with like, note the filing year, and treat major disruptions (like 2020–2021) as discontinuities rather than a continuous baseline.
Missing or N/A does not always mean absent. It can mean the item was not disclosed on that form, not collected on that filing type, or not available for that year.
$7,139,907
$8,445,066
$19,393,895
$7,818,286
45 W-2 employees reported (Form W-3, most recent filing — contractors and volunteers excluded) · TY2024 · 990
Total compensation, benefits & payroll taxes (Part IX)
TY2024$1,170,245
Full cost to employ everyone — wages + employer benefits + payroll taxes. Not officer pay alone.
~$26,000 per employee ⓘ — average across 45 W-2 employees; includes benefits & payroll taxes; part-time and seasonal staff counted at full weight.
Named officers/key employees (Part VII‑A) show reportable compensation only and are already included in the Part IX total above. They are not additive.
Named staff org comp sums to $528,216. The remaining $642,029 is unlisted staff labor cost — includes benefits & payroll taxes for all employees, not any one person's salary.
Professional & consulting fees (Part IX, line 11)
TY2024$62,411
Payments to outside firms and independent contractors — not included in the Part IX labor total above. Combined with the labor total, full people cost is $1,232,656.
Functional Expense Allocation (Part IX)
TY2024$8,445,066total functional expenses
0.0%
Program services
$0
0.0%
Management & general
$0
0.0%
Fundraising
$0
Source: Form 990, Part IX, line 25. A higher program-service percentage generally indicates more mission-directed spending.
Historical Trends
Revenue vs. Expenses
Net Revenue / Operating Margin
Net Assets
Revenue Trend
| Tax Year | Period | Form | Revenue | Expenses | Net Revenue | Net Assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TY2020 | 2020–2021 | 990 | $1,299,535 | $1,431,911 | -$132,376 | $2,820,324 |
| TY2021 | 2020–2021 | 990 | $1,769,798 | $1,793,049 | -$23,251 | $2,728,386 |
| TY2022 | 2022+ | 990 | $11,770,988 | $2,663,183 | $9,107,805 | $8,869,762 |
| TY2023 | 2022+ | 990 | $3,068,320 | $2,814,637 | $253,683 | $9,123,445 |
| TY2024 | 2022+ | 990 | $7,139,907 | $8,445,066 | -$1,305,159 | $7,818,286 |
Revenue trend is a filing-history view. It helps you compare operating periods, not infer the club's live condition today.
Revenue Breakdown (Part VIII — most recent year)
Form 990, Part VIII — Statement of Revenue. Includes, but is not limited to: Line 1 = contributions and grants (including member dues reported as contributions). Lines 2a–2f = program service revenue (activities that directly further the organization's exempt purpose). Line 3 = investment income. The specific mix varies by organization type. Source: the organization's own sworn filing.
| Line | Description | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| 11a | DEBT SERVICE FEE | $597,425 |
| 11b | MISC. REVENUE | $12,674 |
| 12 | Total revenue | $7,139,907 |
| 1f | All other contributions, gifts, grants | $6,380,902 |
| 1h | Total contributions and grants | $6,380,902 |
| 2a | MEMBERSHIP DUES | $1,058,343 |
| 2b | INITIATION DUES | $386,000 |
| 2c | MARINA REVENUE | $365,945 |
| 2d | SAILING CENTER | $20,386 |
| 2f | Total program service revenue | $1,830,674 |
| 3 | Investment income | $372,116 |
| 6c | Net rental income or (loss) | -$8,346 |
Most revenue is reported in a single category this year. That can be normal for some org types; see the source filing for detail.
Balance Sheet (Part X)
TY2024| Line | Description | BOY | EOY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | Total assets | $20,835,779 | $19,393,895 |
| 26 | Total liabilities | $11,712,334 | $11,575,609 |
| 33 | Total net assets or fund balances | $9,123,445 | $7,818,286 |
Source: Form 990, Part X, Balance Sheet.
Officers & Key Staff (Part VII)
How to read this section
This is not a full staff directory. It is the subset of people the organization had to disclose in Form 990, Part VII (the officer, director, trustee, key employee, and highest-compensated employee section of the filing). Why this matters: a missing name does not mean a person was not employed or involved.
Total Volunteer Board Hours/Week (Selected Year): 62
Hours per week are self-reported by each officer on Form 990, Part VII. They are not verified.
Officers and directors as reported on Form 990, Part VII. These are typically unpaid, elected positions. If an officer receives compensation, it will appear in the Paid Staff tab.
Operationally, this section is most useful for understanding disclosed leadership structure, compensation visibility, and board labor — not for reconstructing the full staffing model of a club.
| Name | Title | Hours/Week | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEVIN HENNESSY | VICE CHAIRMAN | 2 | Volunteer |
| GEOFF WALKER | DIRECTOR | 2 | Volunteer |
| MAUREEN BAUWENS | DIRECTOR | 2 | Volunteer |
| KEN BOSTROM | DIRECTOR | 2 | Volunteer |
| PAUL SODEN | DIRECTOR | 2 | Volunteer |
| VICKI BRETTHAUER | SECRETARY | 2 | Volunteer |
| JIM RICH | DIRECTOR | 2 | Volunteer |
| MISSY DUFFY | CLUB MANAGER | 40 | Volunteer |
| GERRY GORMAN | TREASURER | 2 | Volunteer |
| CINDY KROEGER | DIRECTOR | 2 | Volunteer |
| TOM MORRISON | DIRECTOR | 2 | Volunteer |
| DAVID EVERITT | CHAIRMAN | 2 | Volunteer |
Governance & Transparency Signals
The IRS Form 990 is a sworn disclosure document — not just a tax return. Beyond financials, it captures governance policies, compensation practices, and relationships between insiders and the organization. Every category below comes directly from that filing. When a field is blank, it is often because this form type doesn’t require it, or the org doesn’t meet the threshold that triggers disclosure. That context is itself worth knowing.
Conflict of Interest Policy
Form 990, Part VI — Line 12a
Governance data not available for this organization’s most recent filing year. This can occur for newly filed returns not yet in the corpus, or for organizations whose XML filing did not include Part VI.
Whistleblower Protection Policy
Form 990, Part VI — Line 13
Governance data not available for this organization’s most recent filing year.
Officer & Key Employee Compensation (Part VII)
Form 990, Part VII — Named individuals with reportable compensation
Part VII requires individual disclosure of all officers, directors, trustees, key employees, and the five highest-compensated employees earning above the reporting threshold. The individuals listed here are from the most recent available filing.
| Name | Title | Comp from Org |
|---|---|---|
| CARRISSA L BROOKS | GENERAL MANAGER | $122,351 |
| Robert N Aylwin | Club Manager | $121,614 |
| CARRISSA L BROOKS | GENERAL MANAGER | $93,301 |
| MARK J FELBINGER | CLUB MANAGER | $78,307 |
| Mark J Felbinger | Club Manager | $78,307 |
| MARK J FELBINGER | CLUB MANAGER | $34,336 |
Compensation shown is reportable compensation from this organization only, as disclosed in Part VII. The $150,000 threshold is significant context: most volunteer-run sailing clubs report $0 for all officers. When professional staff — a General Manager, Executive Director, or Harbor Master — earns above that level, it signals an org operating more like a business than a volunteer collective. That’s not inherently good or bad: a $12M club with 45 full-time employees may well need a $200K GM. But a $400K club paying its Commodore $180K warrants scrutiny.
Independent Compensation Consultant
Schedule J, Part I — Organizations filing when comp exceeds $150K
Schedule J not required for this organization.
Schedule J is only filed when at least one individual in Part VII received more than $150,000 in total compensation. This organization doesn’t meet that threshold, so this schedule is not required. Among the 35.7% of organizations in this corpus that do file Schedule J, 35.7% used an independent compensation consultant. When Schedule J IS required, this question asks whether the board hired an outside firm — unconnected to the organization — to benchmark executive pay against market rates. It reduces the risk that a board approves whatever the ED requests rather than what comparable organizations actually pay.
Equity-Based Compensation
Schedule J, Part II — Per-person compensation detail
Schedule J not required for this organization.
Related-Party Transactions (Schedule L)
Schedule L — Transactions with Interested Persons (officers, directors, their families, controlled entities)
Schedule L requires disclosure of loans, grants, and business transactions between the organization and its own insiders — board members, officers, key employees, and their family members or entities they control. Nonprofits are not prohibited from transacting with insiders, but they must disclose it, follow fair-market-value standards, and document that the transaction benefited the organization, not just the insider. These disclosures exist because self-dealing is the most direct way nonprofit assets can flow to those in control.
88 transactions found across all available filing years. Sorted largest to most recent.
| Person / Entity | Relationship | Type | Amount | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | OWNED 100% BY CHAIRMAN, DAVID EVERITT; TREASURER, GERRY GORMAN | loan | $6,425,000 | 2024 |
| — | OWNED 100% BY CHAIRMAN, DAVID EVERITT; TREASURER, GERRY GORMAN | loan | $6,425,000 | 2023 |
| Schmid T | Member | loan | $0 | 2021 |
| Krepelka T | Member | loan | $0 | 2021 |
| ForrayG | Member | loan | $0 | 2021 |
| Cox D | Member | loan | $0 | 2021 |
| WallenW | Member | loan | $0 | 2021 |
| Ferry M | Trustee | loan | $0 | 2021 |
| Marr J | Member | loan | $0 | 2021 |
| SendakT | Member | loan | $0 | 2021 |
| LemoineD | Member | loan | $0 | 2021 |
| EverittD | Member | loan | $0 | 2021 |
Showing 12 of 88 total transactions.
⚠️ Entity-controlled transactions detected. One or more transactions involve an entity owned or controlled by a board officer. Even if terms are fair, this is a related-party transaction of the highest order: the lender has direct influence over whether the loan is repaid, on what terms, and whether it was structured to benefit the club or themselves. Key questions: Was interest charged at market rate? Did a disinterested board majority approve it? Is there a documented repayment schedule?
📋 Context note. Where available, transactional context may be supplemented by audited financial statements or other independent disclosures that are not derived from 990 XML data alone. When an independent audit confirms the terms, repayment schedule, and arm's-length pricing of a related-party loan, the transaction carries a materially different risk profile than the 990 alone would suggest.
Member capital loans are the most common Schedule L pattern in the sailing corpus. When a club needs dock repairs, marina upgrades, or clubhouse renovations, it sometimes turns to its own members as lenders rather than commercial banks — effectively, members financing their own infrastructure. These can be legitimate and transparent. What to look for: Are the loans repaid? Are interest rates reasonable? Are new loans replacing old ones, or is the balance growing?
Schedule O — Supplemental Information (most recent year)
Organizations use Schedule O to provide additional explanation for answers given on the main 990 form. These are direct excerpts from the filed document.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19
THE ORGANIZATION'S GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 6
THE CLUB IS A PRIVATE, MEMBER-OWNED CLUB THAT IS OPERATED FOR THE LEISURE AND RECREATION OF ITS MEMBERS.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 7A
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS ELECTED ANNUALLY BY THE MEMBERS. THE FOLLOWING MEMBERSHIP CATEGORIES HAVE VOTING PRIVILEGES: CHARTER MEMBERS AND EQUITY MEMBERS.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 7B
THE DECISIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE MEMBERS.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11B
THE ORGANIZATION FINDS THAT IT IS NOT EFFECTIVE NOR EFFICIENT FOR THE ENTIRE GOVERNING BOARD TO REVIEW FORM 990 BEFORE FILING. THEREFORE, THE BOARD DELEGATES THE REVIEW OF FORM 990 AND THE RELATED SCHEDULES TO THE PRESIDENT WHO REVIEWS THE FORM 990 WITH THE CPA FIRM THAT HAS PREPARED THE RETURN PRIOR TO FILING FORM 990. THE PRESIDENT THEN SUMMARIZES THE FILING RESULTS AND INFORMATION WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
Mission
TO BIND ITS MEMBERS TOGETHER BY A COMMON OBJECTIVE TO PROVIDE LEISURE AND RECREATION.
As stated in the organization's 990 filing.
IRS Source Filings
Source filings are IRS e-file records in XML (Extensible Markup Language) format — a structured data standard used by the IRS for electronic filing. If you open one of these links, it will look like code. That's not an error — that's what XML looks like. Harbor Commons processes this raw XML and presents the structured, readable view you see above.
Why this matters: the XML is the receipt. Harbor Commons is the reading layer on top of that receipt. If you ever need to verify a number, wording choice, or disclosure, the source filing is where to check.
Similar Organizations
Finding peer organizations…
Capacity Signals
Auto-detected patterns from this organization's own IRS filing history. Signals are relative to this org's trend only — not peer comparisons, not judgments.
Private clubs are naturally labor-heavy. Always interpret signals against this organization's own context before drawing conclusions.
Labor's share of expenses fell sharply
Labor costs as a share of total expenses dropped 39 percentage points in one year — from 53% (TY2023) to 14% (TY2024).
Why it matters: A rapid shift in cost mix can indicate outsourcing, capital investment, or a change in program delivery model — each with different capacity implications.
Operator question: Did non-labor costs rise (capital project, insurance spike, contractor shift), or did the organization reduce its labor investment relative to activity?
Expenses grew faster than labor
Total expenses rose 200% (TY2023→TY2024) while labor costs grew less than 2%. The gap is being filled by non-labor spending — contractors, facilities, insurance, or other professional services.
Why it matters: When expense growth consistently outpaces labor growth, the organization may be substituting staff with outside contractors — or absorbing rising fixed costs without expanding its team.
Operator question: Which non-labor line items drove the increase: outside contractors (Part IX line 11), occupancy, or insurance?
Phase 2 signals (contractor substitution, benefits share changes) require Part IX line-level data and are not yet available. All computations use IRS-filed data only; no external benchmarks or CPI adjustments beyond a 3% per year inflation proxy.
📡 Filing Signals (19 total)
Trends and shifts computed from this organization's own public filings across all available years. Signals highlight where numbers changed — not whether those changes are good or bad. Only people with inside knowledge of this organization can interpret what these signals mean.
Signals describe filing history, not the club's live operating state. The newest filing may still lag current reality by many months.
See an error?
If you spot a data discrepancy, misattribution, or filing mismatch — let us know.
Send us a signal →